Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Defining intelligence is a challenging and fraught task, but one that neuroscientists are repeatedly confronted with. A central goal of neuroscience is to understand how phenomena like intelligent behaviors emerge from nervous systems. This requires some determination of what defines intelligence and how to measure it. The challenge is multifaceted. For instance, as we begin to describe and understand the brain in increasingly specific physical terms (e.g., anatomy, cell types, activity patterns), we amplify an ever‐growing divide in how we connect measurable properties of the brain to less tangible concepts like intelligence. As our appreciation for evolutionary diversity in neuroscience grows, we are further confronted with whether there can be a unifying theory of intelligence. The National Science Foundation (NSF) NeuroNex consortium recently gathered experts from multiple animal model systems to discuss intelligence across species. We summarize here the different perspectives offered by the consortium, with the goal of promoting thought and debate of this ancient question from a modern perspective, and asking whether defining intelligence is a useful exercise in neuroscience or an ill‐posed and distracting question. We present data from the vantage points of humans, macaques, ferrets, crows, octopuses, bees, and flies, highlighting some of the noteworthy capabilities of each species within the context of each species’ ecological niche and how these may be challenged by climate change. We also include a remarkable example of convergent evolution between primates and crows in the circuit and molecular basis for working memory in these highly divergent animal species. 

Abstract The neotenous, or delayed, development of primate neurons, particularly human ones, is thought to underlie primate-specific abilities like cognition. We tested whether synaptic development follows suit—would synapses, in absolute time, develop slower in longer-lived, highly cognitive species like non-human primates than in shorter-lived species with less human-like cognitive abilities, e.g., the mouse? Instead, we find that excitatory and inhibitory synapses in the maleMus musculus(mouse) andRhesus macaque(primate) cortex form at similar rates, at similar times after birth. Primate excitatory and inhibitory synapses and mouse excitatory synapses also prune in such an isochronic fashion. Mouse inhibitory synapses are the lone exception, which are not pruned and instead continuously added throughout life. The monotony of synaptic development clocks across species with disparate lifespans, experiences, and cognitive abilities argues that such programs are likely orchestrated by genetic events rather than experience. 

Electron imaging of biological samples stained with heavy metals has enabled visualization of nanoscale subcellular structures critical in chemical-, structural-, and neuro-biology. In particular, osmium tetroxide has been widely adopted for selective lipid imaging. Despite the ubiquity of its use, the osmium speciation in lipid membranes and the mechanism for image contrast in electron microscopy (EM) have continued to be open questions, limiting efforts to improve staining protocols and improve high-resolution imaging of biological samples. Following our recent success using photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) to image mouse brain tissues with a subcellular resolution of 15 nm, we have used PEEM to determine the chemical contrast mechanism of Os staining in lipid membranes. Os (IV), in the form of OsO2, generates aggregates in lipid membranes, leading to a strong spatial variation in the electronic structure and electron density of states. OsO2 has a metallic electronic structure that drastically increases the electron density of states near the Fermi level. Depositing metallic OsO2 in lipid membranes allows for strongly enhanced EM signals of biological materials. This understanding of the membrane contrast mechanism of Os-stained biological specimens provides a new opportunity for the exploration and development of staining protocols for high-resolution, high-contrast EM imaging. 

Abstract Electron imaging of biological samples stained with heavy metals has enabled visualization of subcellular structures critical in chemical‐, structural‐, and neuro‐biology. In particular, osmium tetroxide (OsO₄) has been widely adopted for selective lipid imaging. Despite the ubiquity of its use, the osmium speciation in lipid membranes and the process for contrast generation in electron microscopy (EM) have continued to be open questions, limiting efforts to improve staining protocols and therefore high‐resolution nanoscale imaging of biological samples. Following our recent success using photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) to image mouse brain tissues with synaptic resolution, we have used PEEM to determine the nanoscale electronic structure of Os‐stained biological samples. Os(IV), in the form of OsO₂, generates nanoaggregates in lipid membranes, leading to a strong spatial variation in the electronic structure and electron density of states. OsO₂has a metallic electronic structure that drastically increases the electron density of states near the Fermi level. Depositing metallic OsO₂in lipid membranes allows for strongly enhanced EM signals and conductivity of biological materials. The identification of the chemical species and understanding of the membrane contrast mechanism of Os‐stained biological specimens provides a new opportunity for the development of staining protocols for high‐resolution, high‐contrast EM imaging.